![]() I bought Dorico in the first place because of its promise of doing this kind of things just right by default. But I don’t consider myself a music engraving expert. You’re right, I can adjust the default position of the breath marks, which is great. (It took me a while before figuring out that pressing enter didn’t work either. I just think using the mouse is more intuitive in this case. Yes, being able to enter text edit mode by hitting enter will certainly help! It would also be nice if double-clicking the currently selected frame did the same, instead of selecting the other frame, though. Am I just missing a modifier key or something? Is there a way to edit the text inside without having to move away the frame first? The frame seems to be z-layered below the Title frame, but I would not need to adjust the z-layering if there was a way to “click-through” the Title frame. I have created a frame with the “EG 421” text, which I have lined up to the Title frame. Why are the breathe marks so close to the following note? To me, this looks awkward especially in the bass line. Seems Lilypond does this “right” by default.) Of course, I could achive this by inserting a manual line break, but hopefully there is an automatic way? (I cannot remember ever having had this problem with Lilypond, btw. Or should this be left as is from an engraving point of view? (The original edition has it spread out evenly across the two systems.) However, I have a few questions, the most important one being: How do I get Dorico to spread the music evenly across the two systems? I know there is a way to force it to spread the second system across the whole page, but that does not look very good, of course. ![]() json files are there for us to modify as we see fit, with entries that are not necessarily taken from the SMUFL standard.I used Dorico to retypeset this piece of music in g minor, which has worked great so far: It is certainly an elegant way to handle this situation, as long as the metadata. I guess this means adding entries in each font's metadata. Letting each font specify its own defaults for breath mark offset is an interesting idea. It would not be too difficult to then add these settings to the style dialog in a new "Breaths" page. This allows the user to set the style settings for the various breaths and caesuras via the inspector. But if we want to preserve the positioning of adjusted breath marks in existing scores, we should probably leave Breath :: layout ( ) alone and add all of these new styles with a default offset of ( 0.0, 0.0 ). If we don't care about altering the positioning of breath marks with adjusted Y-offsets in existing scores, adding these styles with carefully calculated defaults would allow us to really trim down the Breath :: layout ( ) code. I can see having separate PosAbove and PosBelow style settings for each of the four breath symbols (the comma certainly should be able to be styled differently from the others), but shared style settings for most of the caesuras should suffice. Given all of that, and considering what I wrote here two years ago, I am not sure how you can now say that it does not work, since your screenshots clearly demonstrate otherwise.īut setting all of that aside, I agree that this should be handled via style settings. My idea of what is correct is based on Elaine Gould, as well as the links that you yourself have provided ( … and …).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |